Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Participatory Forest Management in Burkina Faso: Perceptions of Local Populations in the Cassou Managed Forest

Received: 24 May 2024     Accepted: 13 June 2024     Published: 23 July 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

In recent decades, the participation of local populations has become an imperative and a solution in forest management. Mystified and idealized, the participatory approach is seen as the key to sustainable management of this resource. This approach was adopted in Burkina Faso in the mid-1980s, leading to the establishment of the Forest Management Sites (FMS or CAF in french), administrative and technical structures for sustainable forest management involving local populations. However, the area of managed forests has continued to decline at an alarming rate. In such a context, we are tempted to ask whether there really is participation in systems described as participatory forest management, and if the populations have appropriated the approach. This study, carried out among the local populations of Cassou forest management site, attempts to answer these questions. Its aim was to gather local people's perceptions on their involvement in the forest management. To achieve the study's objective, eight (8) focus groups with men and women were organized during July and August 2022 in the villages of Cassou, Vrassan, Kou and Dao. The study analyzed local people's perceptions of the following scales of participation: “consultation, involvement, information sharing, collaboration, decision-making and sharing of economic benefits”. The data analysis using Nvivo 21 software showed that local people felt 100% involved only in sharing economic benefits, while the level of participation on the other scales was barely 20%. These results show the low level of participation of local people in the forests management. The decision-makers therefore need to work towards genuine involvement of local populations in the management of these areas, so that they see them as part of the community heritage to be defended. The socio-political situation in Burkina Faso today proves that this is all the more important given that, in addition to the environmental stakes, forests represent a national security issue.

Published in Humanities and Social Sciences (Volume 12, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.hss.20241204.11
Page(s) 66-79
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Participatory Approach, Managed Forest, Cassou, Burkina Faso

References
[1] Alexei, J. 2006: «L’apparition de la notion de participation dans la pensée et le discours du développement» [The emergence of the notion of participation in development thinking and discourse]. Perspectives internationales et européennes, URL:
[2] Ballet, J. 2007: La gestion en commun des ressources naturelles: une perspective critique [Common management of natural resources: a critical perspective], Développement durable et territoires Économie, géographie, politique, droit, sociologie, Varia (2004-2010), 18 pages.
[3] Ballet, J. et al., 2009: La soutenabilité des ressources forestières en Afrique subsaharienne francophone: quels enjeux pour la gestion participative ? [The sustainability of forest resources in French-speaking sub-Saharan Africa: what’s at stake for participatory management?]. De Boeck Supérieur, Mondes en développement, n° 148, pages 31 à 46.
[4] Birba, S. 2014: Evaluation écologique et socio-économique des Chantiers d’Aménagement Forestier (CAF) au Burina Faso: Cas du CAF de Cassou. [Ecological and socio-economic evaluation of forest management sites (CAF) in Burkina Faso: the case of the Cassou CAF] Mémoire de Master en Développement, Université Senghor D’Alexandrie/ Campus Ouaga II, 70p.
[5] Birba, S. et al., 2024: Innovation in Forest Management in Burkina Faso: Analyzing the Dynamics of the Actor-Network in Cassou. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 74-86
[6] Bresson, M. 2014: «La participation, un concept constamment Réinventé: analyse sociologique des enjeux de son usage et de ses variations» [Participation, a concept constantly reinvented: a sociological analysis of the issues surrounding its use and variations], Socio-logos, Revue de l'association française de sociologie. 9 | 2014,
[7] Daou, V. J. et al., 2014, La gestion participative des forêts en Afrique centrale: Logique développementiste, gouvernance antiparticipative et stratégies d’acteurs, [Participatory forest management in Central Africa: developmental logic, anti-participatory governance and stakeholder strategies]. Revue d’ethnoécologie, 28 pages.
[8] Dumas, A. 1983: «Participation et projets de développement » [Participation and development projects]. In: Tiers-Monde., tome 24, n°95, pp. 513-536
[9] Hardin, G. 1968: The Tragedy of the Commons, Science New Series Vol. 162, No. 3859: pp. 1243-1248.
[10] Hurard, M. 2011: La participation citoyenne au développement durable à l’échelle locale en Europe, Think Tank européen Pour la Solidarité, [Citizen participation in local sustainable development in Europe, European Think Tank for Solidarity] Collection Working paper. 25 pages.
[11] International Association for Public Participation, 2000: public participation spectrum,
[12] Kabore, C., 2005: Aménagement des forêts au sahel: Point de vingt années de pratiques au Burkina Faso, [Forest management in the Sahel: Twenty years of practices in Burkina Faso]. Ouagadougou. 142 pages.
[13] Korahiré, J., 2011: La faune sauvage dans la forêt classée et ranch de gibier de Nazinga. Quel modèle pour une gestion durable des ressources fauniques. Thèse unique. [Wildlife in the classified forest and game ranch of Nazinga. A model for sustainable wildlife resource management. Unique thésis], UFR/SEG, Université de Ouagadougou, 232p.
[14] Laurent M. C., 2011: La gestion participative des forêts, une notion devenue multiscalaire et une application différenciée sur le terrain: le cas du Burkina Faso, [Participatory forest management, a concept that has become multiscalar and a differentiated application in the field: the case of Burkina Faso]. Mémoire de recherche, Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Toulouse. 102 pages.
[15] Lebovics M. 2007: Analyse des apports et des contraintes du développement Participatif, [Analysis of the benefits and constraints of participatory development], De Boeck Supérieur | «Afrique contemporaine» n° 223-224 | pages 403 à 432.
[16] Lulle T. 2002: A qui sert la gestion locale participative ? éléments de réflexion à partir d'une expérience à Bogotá (Colombie), [What's the point of participatory local management? Considerations based on an experience in Bogotá (Colombia)]. Presses de Sciences Po | «Autrepart», n° 21 | pages 151 à 168.
[17] Morand M. 1981: Analyse d'un cas d'implantation de la gestion participative en milieu scolaire, Mémoire en vue de l’obtention de la Maitrise en Education, [Analysis of a case study in the implementation of participative management in schools, Master's thesis in Education]. Centre d'études universitaires dans l'ouest Quebecois. 246 pages.
[18] Mormont M. and al., 2006: La participation, composante du développement durable: quatre études de cas, [Participation as a component of sustainable development: four case studies], Vertigo, revue électronique en sciences de l’Environnement, L'Afrique face au développement durable Section courante. Volume 7 Numéro 2. 27 pages.
[19] Poissonnet M. et Lescuyer G., 2005: Aménagement forestier et participation: quelles leçons tirer des forêts communales du Cameroun? [Forest management and participation: what lessons can be learned from Cameroon's communal forests?], VertigO - la revue électronique en sciences de l'environnement, Volume 6 Numéro 2.
[20] Primo O. 2017: Participation, développement communautaire et organisation non-gouvernementale. Mémoire, Université d’État d’Haïti, Faculté des sciences humaines, [Participation, community development and non-governmental organizations. Master thesis, Haïti State University, Faculty of Human Sciences] 146 pages.
[21] Ringuette, A. S-A. 2014. Gestion participative des ressources naturelle: analyse de son efficacité au Burkina Faso, [Participatory management of natural resources: analysis of its effectiveness in Burkina Faso], Master thesis on Environment, University of Sherbrooke, 114 pages.
[22] Yelkouni, M. 2005: La gestion communautaire: une alternative pour la forêt de Tiogo au Burkina Faso, [Community management: an alternative for the Tiogo forest in Burkina Faso]. Armand colin | «revue d’économie régionale & urbaine» pp 557 à 578
[23] Zougouri, S. 2008: Derrière la vitrine du développement: aménagement forestier et pouvoir local au Burkina Faso, [Behind the development showcase: Forest management and local power in Burkina Faso]. PhD Thesis, Uppsala Universitet, Studies in Cultural Anthropology. 274 pages.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Sibiri, B., Eveline, C., Jacqueline, S., Patrice, T., Souleymane, O. (2024). Participatory Forest Management in Burkina Faso: Perceptions of Local Populations in the Cassou Managed Forest. Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(4), 66-79. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20241204.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Sibiri, B.; Eveline, C.; Jacqueline, S.; Patrice, T.; Souleymane, O. Participatory Forest Management in Burkina Faso: Perceptions of Local Populations in the Cassou Managed Forest. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2024, 12(4), 66-79. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20241204.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Sibiri B, Eveline C, Jacqueline S, Patrice T, Souleymane O. Participatory Forest Management in Burkina Faso: Perceptions of Local Populations in the Cassou Managed Forest. Humanit Soc Sci. 2024;12(4):66-79. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20241204.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.hss.20241204.11,
      author = {Birba Sibiri and Compaoré Eveline and Sow Jacqueline and Toé Patrice and Ouedraogo Souleymane},
      title = {Participatory Forest Management in Burkina Faso: Perceptions of Local Populations in the Cassou Managed Forest
    },
      journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences},
      volume = {12},
      number = {4},
      pages = {66-79},
      doi = {10.11648/j.hss.20241204.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20241204.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20241204.11},
      abstract = {In recent decades, the participation of local populations has become an imperative and a solution in forest management. Mystified and idealized, the participatory approach is seen as the key to sustainable management of this resource. This approach was adopted in Burkina Faso in the mid-1980s, leading to the establishment of the Forest Management Sites (FMS or CAF in french), administrative and technical structures for sustainable forest management involving local populations. However, the area of managed forests has continued to decline at an alarming rate. In such a context, we are tempted to ask whether there really is participation in systems described as participatory forest management, and if the populations have appropriated the approach. This study, carried out among the local populations of Cassou forest management site, attempts to answer these questions. Its aim was to gather local people's perceptions on their involvement in the forest management. To achieve the study's objective, eight (8) focus groups with men and women were organized during July and August 2022 in the villages of Cassou, Vrassan, Kou and Dao. The study analyzed local people's perceptions of the following scales of participation: “consultation, involvement, information sharing, collaboration, decision-making and sharing of economic benefits”. The data analysis using Nvivo 21 software showed that local people felt 100% involved only in sharing economic benefits, while the level of participation on the other scales was barely 20%. These results show the low level of participation of local people in the forests management. The decision-makers therefore need to work towards genuine involvement of local populations in the management of these areas, so that they see them as part of the community heritage to be defended. The socio-political situation in Burkina Faso today proves that this is all the more important given that, in addition to the environmental stakes, forests represent a national security issue.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Participatory Forest Management in Burkina Faso: Perceptions of Local Populations in the Cassou Managed Forest
    
    AU  - Birba Sibiri
    AU  - Compaoré Eveline
    AU  - Sow Jacqueline
    AU  - Toé Patrice
    AU  - Ouedraogo Souleymane
    Y1  - 2024/07/23
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20241204.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.hss.20241204.11
    T2  - Humanities and Social Sciences
    JF  - Humanities and Social Sciences
    JO  - Humanities and Social Sciences
    SP  - 66
    EP  - 79
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8184
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20241204.11
    AB  - In recent decades, the participation of local populations has become an imperative and a solution in forest management. Mystified and idealized, the participatory approach is seen as the key to sustainable management of this resource. This approach was adopted in Burkina Faso in the mid-1980s, leading to the establishment of the Forest Management Sites (FMS or CAF in french), administrative and technical structures for sustainable forest management involving local populations. However, the area of managed forests has continued to decline at an alarming rate. In such a context, we are tempted to ask whether there really is participation in systems described as participatory forest management, and if the populations have appropriated the approach. This study, carried out among the local populations of Cassou forest management site, attempts to answer these questions. Its aim was to gather local people's perceptions on their involvement in the forest management. To achieve the study's objective, eight (8) focus groups with men and women were organized during July and August 2022 in the villages of Cassou, Vrassan, Kou and Dao. The study analyzed local people's perceptions of the following scales of participation: “consultation, involvement, information sharing, collaboration, decision-making and sharing of economic benefits”. The data analysis using Nvivo 21 software showed that local people felt 100% involved only in sharing economic benefits, while the level of participation on the other scales was barely 20%. These results show the low level of participation of local people in the forests management. The decision-makers therefore need to work towards genuine involvement of local populations in the management of these areas, so that they see them as part of the community heritage to be defended. The socio-political situation in Burkina Faso today proves that this is all the more important given that, in addition to the environmental stakes, forests represent a national security issue.
    
    VL  - 12
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Institut for Environment and Agricultural Research, National Centre for Scientific and Technological Research, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso; Laboratory of Rural Studies on Environment and the Economic and Social Development (LRSE/ESD), Nazi Boni University, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso

  • Institut for Environment and Agricultural Research, National Centre for Scientific and Technological Research, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

  • Laboratory of Rural Studies on Environment and the Economic and Social Development (LRSE/ESD), Nazi Boni University, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso

  • Laboratory of Rural Studies on Environment and the Economic and Social Development (LRSE/ESD), Nazi Boni University, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso

  • Institut for Environment and Agricultural Research, National Centre for Scientific and Technological Research, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso; Laboratory of Rural Studies on Environment and the Economic and Social Development (LRSE/ESD), Nazi Boni University, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso

  • Sections